to Hive being
welcome
What is Hive Being, and Why the Name?
You have likely heard talk of a hive mind, where one global mind finds more or less figurative expression in various local minds. Such talk is common enough in nature documentaries, especially ones concerning ants or bees, and in sci-fi programs. Take that notion, at least a loose version of it, and broaden its scope. That will be a decent first step in understanding the title I have chosen both for my Blog and for the first five-volume installment of my magnum opus Made For You and Me, a fragmentary collection of minimalist stanzas from 2016 to 2020.
In alignment with Spinoza (the 17th Century Rationalist to whom I devoted my doctoral studies), I view reality in its totality as a grand hive Being: all entities are but pulsating manifestations of the buckstopping fount of everything, an ultimate being we might call “God” or “Nature” (so long as, out of respect for the capital “G” and the capital “N,” we limit it neither to some anthropomorphic cloud father hurling lightning bolts nor to mere wilderness untouched by human smog). According to the hive-Being view (where reality is one lone superorganism, a monistic—and we might even say unividualist—conception I defend in both my creative and academic capacities), each non-foundational being (each being, that is, whose essence does not involve existence) is an utterly necessitated expression or eruption or exudation of this eternal source—each is, perhaps better put, a mode or manner of being, and so a focal point through which is disclosed, what classical theists sometimes call “being itself” (ipsum esse subsistens): the realness of the real, the being of whatever may be, the sheer activity of being, the very isness of whatever is. This Blog, which duplicates my Substack, throbs as but one among many literary unfurlings of this self-necessitated foundation, this supreme wellspring, of which we—like black holes and broken beliefs, like fractal ferns and flickering flames—are the inevitable stylings.
My Journey
I am an academic who found himself pressured into early retirement by the rising tides of cancel culture. The illiberal scourge of censoring, silencing, and shaming—although always with us throughout our evolution—reached a local peak around 2021. That was the turbulent year my creative pursuits, which the old left once encouraged as a healthy outlet for the stresses of a childhood steeped in poverty and illiteracy, drew the ire of the new safe-space left. A small cadre of self-proclaimed victims and their allies, several of whom continue to berate me years later under pseudonyms as see through as their sexual infatuation, sought to erase me and my heterodoxy. They found support from a wannabe-woke dean, covered in the grand inquisitor robes of our decadent modernity (full-body tattoos) and just itching to signal his commitment to protecting “vulnerable populations” from triggering material (even if just, as it was in my case, off-duty poems “unbecoming for someone calling himself a teacher”). Although I eventually won my due-process case with the help of The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, I slunk away from a college that turned its back on protecting freedom of expression and from an institution increasingly intolerant of intellectual diversity.
The wrecking ball to my too-comfy office in the windowless ivory tower came with a silver lining. From the ashes of my professional aspirations rose a phoenix of increased freedom to fulfill the literary calling I have pursued for decades. Reputation concerns never stopped me, even within academia’s sterile halls of conformity. Indeed, my unapologetic defiance, which has long baffled friends and family, no doubt chummed even safe waters—almost as if I were asking for it all along—until the cancel shiver grew too frenzied to hold back its blind thrashings. But now, now I piston the most forbidden territories of human thought with no longer even a twinge of conscience. The newfound freedom means extra time to hone my craft. When not assisting special-needs communities (a day job far more rewarding than freeway-flyer drudgeries), I pursue my literary mission with Dionysian fervor.
Call for Co-Conspirators
This space, my digital sanctuary, showcases the fruits of my mission. Think of my posts, even those linking to my publications, as works in progress. I want your input, unflinching brutality included. Each post begins with an invitation to action: “Let’s workshop this [draft about x, y, z].” Your contributions, whether through public comments or my contact page, help hammer scraps of ore into polished blades fit for magazine publication.
Your input is valuable, even if you are neither a writer nor a reader of literature—twin disciplines dying by the cyber nanosecond. Sometimes—even if at the risk of uttering banalities—an outsider’s fresh vantage can pierce the veils of convention to reveal what insiders miss. It often takes an outsider to make us even think to question our ingrained presuppositions and attitudes. I stand by the hygienic value of contagion. That is one reason I advocate so strongly for intellectual diversity and freedom of expression. And that is also one reason I was so harrowed by the anti-diversity swell of cancel culture in academia (an institution that should be the utmost caretaker of such values)—harrowed especially insofar as that swell masqueraded under the gaslighting guise of “diversity”).
You will witness the breathing evolution of my writings over time. To track these changes, I label each revision by round: “ROUND 2,” ROUND 3,” and so forth. Each piece undergoes continuous refinement based on your feedback and my own revisitations. Sometimes changes will mar the work. That is the risk of creative tinkering as a finite creature. I hope you will alert me to missteps. After many semesters of university writing workshops, one rule has impressed itself upon me: when someone senses a flaw, something almost always needs to change—even if, yes, the proposed solution misses the mark (which often it does). From a quick look into the archives, accessible here, you can see how much I have benefited from your feedback so far.
My Hope
Sharing drafts can be daunting. But showing you the ravaged and unperfumed real deal unfiltered by makeup (stuttering starts and falsities, awkward line breaks and clumsy word choices, grammatical errors and misspellings)—that not only makes my work more relatable, but helps me refine things through your input. I hope the unfiltered look at the raw process of fumbling, rather than just the polished product, also helps other writers develop their craft. Imperfect works often instruct more than perfect ones: whereas the perfect ones tend to have a grace by which they slip inside us without activating our scrutiny, the imperfect ones—especially the near perfect ones—show us glaringly what not to do.
People laugh at me, seeing—in my tilting at the windmills of literary excellence—a Don Quixote clunking around in Arthurian armor in a post-knight era. I am not naïve. I am well aware of the diminishing ability to read, let alone well: slowly and deeply, with gratitude. I am also aware that my style, which often nests subpoints within larger points, never waters down virtuosity for the sake of mass appeal. I watch readers stumble over my sentences, unable to unlock even just the music of the envelope let alone the semantic meat within, which—given my tendency to flashlight through the darker facets of human nature (the addicts, the miscreants, the abusers among us)—only adds an additional alienating layer of difficulty). Beholding these depressive scenes of even supportive family members getting bucked off my syntactic bronco makes me feel like a dinosaur who should get a hint and, if not succumb to the brain rot of skibidi-toilet speak, just hang himself already. Even though the decline in linguistic background and grammatical voltage makes my compositions seem quixotic in a world binging Netflix and TikTok, I persist—raging against the dying of the light—by some internal compulsion to celebrate the richness of language and thought.
My hope is that, despite social media’s unparalleled power to farm our attention, people never forget the unique power of writing. Beyond unveiling hypocrisy, teasing out complex implications, and detailing the commonalities between even the most alien phenomena, writing offers something we need today—trapped in agoraphobic cyber bubbles only thickened by the Lyme dangers of forests and the COVID dangers of cities—perhaps more than ever. Granting us rich access to the first-person perspectives of others (to how things feel to them), writing serves as one of humanity’s best tools for combating loneliness. It allows us to linger, broadly and deeply and at high resolution, within the inner lives of others in a way that other arts can only suggest.
What to Expect
My work spans a broad spectrum: from metaphysical discourses on free will and determinism and the ontology of holes to the ephemera of western culture (whether the childhood impacts of the hypersexual mono-image of black woman as squirting twerkers or Terrence Howard’s sham revolution of mathematics). Some tight and minimal, others free-flowing sprawls; some heady and abstract, others emotional and imagistic—my inkwell musings, which often blend scholarly rigor with a dark humor from both high and low culture, aim to capture the visceral intensity of our personal and social and ultimately existential predicaments.
By no means can I deny that drug abuse, sexual assault, and the tales of the broken and the damned loom large in the tag cloud of my work. My writing will never be a paradise of easy truths and comforting lies. It will challenge you, provoke you, and at times even repulse you. I offer no apologies for the monsters I unleash. They are as much a part of us, at long root scared rodent mammals scurrying in the shadows of dinosaurs, as our noblest aspirations.
But make no mistake. It is not all downer darkness. The archives are my receipts. You will find pieces exploring the pursuit of authenticity in a media-saturated world, the search for meaning in an indifferent cosmos, and the celebration of beauty in both the sublime and the profane. I locate much of my inspiration, in fact, in novelists like Dostoevsky and poets like Ted Kooser—writers unafraid to pursue moral agendas or risk Hallmark sentimentality in an age that often sneers at sincerity.
Be they satirical dissections of modern social dynamics or poignant poems about addiction or academic articles on moral responsibility, my goal is to provoke thought, evoke emotion, and foster meaningful dialogue. Fear has not and will not stop me from challenging humanity’s fundamental taboos (like bestiality and cannibalism) or self-reflecting into the dark chaos of the subconscious, even if that means exposing the Jungian shadows—the inner Goebbels—lurking within us all!
Expect posts each day, no day missed. Donations are welcome, but I impose no paywall: it feels wrong to charge for art, especially given our date with obliteration. Feel free to explore what amounts to, at the time of writing this, close to a thousand pieces of poetry and prose here. That should give you a sense of what awaits.
Join me—specula holstered—on this literary odyssey into the public and private nooks of the hive Being. Let us navigate the labyrinth of creation together, confronting our demons and even slaying our darlings if we must. Let us dance on the razor’s edge between the sublime and the profane in pursuit of an elusive literary perfection never to be confused—as it has been confused in our declining civilization—with the pursuit of popularity or likeability over truth.
tag cloud
- literature community
- American literature
- poetry
- literature
- poem
- literary
- creative writing
- writing
- poetry community
- Michael Istvan
- Istvan
- perception
- defiance
- suffering
- existential poetry
- dissociative
- existential
- healing
- human
- mortality
- power
- art
- artist
- God
- evolution
- love
- death
- darwin
- anxiety
- rape
- psychoanalysis
- addiction
- homeless
- addict
- trauma
- therapy
- rapist
- traumatic
- hypersexual
- grooming
- hyperarousal
- anal
- anal sex
- heart
- meditation
- incendiary
- Identitarianism
- dead
- tyrant
- poverty
- fap
- choking
- traitor
- honey pot
- treachery
- true crime
- identity
- cunnilingus
- power dynamic
- Vaginal
- woke
- OwnVoices
- disease
- crack
- animals
- empathy
- ally
- crime
- scarf
- summer
- body disposal
- kidnapping
- identity politics
- indians
- turtles
- Vagina
- sex
- Klan
- anality
- surrealism
- fisting
- poet
- erotic
- scatalogical
- Pussy
- sublime
- safe space
- adolescence
- poetry editor
- censor
- Nietzsche
- class
- censors
- artistry
- campus warrior
- borders
- violence
- substance abuse
- mega dildo
- Earth
Posts
Pumps and a Bump (ROUND 8)
“Pumps and a Bump” operates as a high-octane, claustrophobic study of the pathology of boundary collapse, forensic panic, and sexual predation under the alibi of medical authority. The piece explicitly rejects both the sanitizing vocabulary of trauma discourse and the standard legal syntax of consent, embedding itself instead in an asymmetrical zone of cognitive and somatic violence: the premeditated violation of a sedated pediatric patient by a pediatric dentist, Dr. James. Yet, what distinguishes this work is that it does not stop at criminal pathology or sensationalist shock. Instead, it uses an extreme study in compulsion, rationalization, and metaphysical absurdity to interrogate broader questions about agency, repetition, and the grotesque persistence of desire. The narrative engine of the text is not merely the transgressive act itself, but the immense, agonizingly deferred physiological and mechanical preparation that precedes it, contrasted sharply against the instantaneous, frantic reversal of the post-coital cleanup. By tracking this cycle, the text positions the predatory body as a machine trapped between biological hyper-secretion and thermodynamic panic, ultimately using one particularly monstrous case to ask whether the compulsive momentum visible in him is simply an intensified version of the same absurd force animating all life.
The opening movement establishes the offender not first through his crime, but through the infrastructure and bodily mechanics of obsession. Dr. James’s two-week abstinence is characterized not as a moral exercise, but as a severe hydraulic engineering project. The text maps this build-up onto a hostile, hyper-fertile spring landscape marked by the “musty rot and metallic tang of Bradford pears in their hysterical bloom” and the “fermented carnality” of a dental hygienist’s “tuberose scent bubble.” The protagonist’s physical gait is structurally deformed by his internal accumulation; he adopts a wide stance and a “mincing,” crab-like walk that he deceptively frames to his staff as a sports injury (“My racquetball days are done”). His discomfort, his odd gait, his improvisational excuses—all create a portrait of a man whose body has become completely subordinated to an elaborate ritual of deferred gratification. The description of his self-imposed fast is grotesquely comic in its extremity, yet this humor serves a serious psychological function: it reveals the absurd lengths to which desire can restructure ordinary life, turning compulsion into something infrastructural rather than episodic. The calendar markings, the broken novelty Dino Dental pens busting apart into "doohickey springs of steampunk," the customer irritability, and the sharp bodily pains shooting toward his kidneys make the build-up feel like an agonizing containment system. Seconds are described as “ratcheted so open in [their] splay” that time itself undergoes a painful dilation, forcing him to maintain a continuous pelvic contraction ("holding a kegel—pelvic floor white as his toe knuckles") to prevent the entire structural architecture of his desire from unzipping too soon.
A major strength of the piece is its refusal to frame the subject’s psychology as wholly alien or existing in a vacuum. The analogies to crack addicts searching the rug for what they know are only baking-soda pebbles of carpet deodorizer, broody hens incubating golf balls until a real egg comes along, and a bereaved orca carrying her decomposing calf over weeks to the surface to “breathe” all work toward a disturbing proposition: irrational persistence is not exceptional, but deeply continuous with life itself. The predator becomes not less monstrous, but more unsettling precisely because his internal mechanisms rhyme with broader biological patterns of fixation, investment, and denial. This calculations-based framework transforms the body into a tactical asset, emphasizing that the protagonist is entirely un-entitled to pity because his suffering is a closed, autogenous loop. It is a self-inflicted pressure system designed to withstand the interim how for the sake of a precise, teleological why, proving that "even water tastes like manna after two days of abstinence."
The structural pivot of the narrative occurs at the exact moment of climax, described as a "ballistic bluster furious enough to displace a ceiling tile." The act itself is marked by an obsessive, mechanical completionism—an absolute refusal to let "one gelatinous clot less than all he had to give fill the patient." The mouth of the anesthetized child is explicitly defined as a "consolation cavity," a secondary surrogate for the other, more legally and physically damning anatomical spaces that he cannot fully violate without immediate detection. However, the core analytical interest of the text lies in the immediate, split-second transition from total, transgressive abandon to the panicked discipline of forensic erasure. The absolute sovereignty of the predatory ego instantly collapses into an absolute state of legal and social vulnerability, providing the piece's central absurdist engine. The same obsessive drive powers both violation and concealment; the instant he stands there knowing no more contractions are coming, the offender frantically works to erase the evidence. His transformation from a figure of complete self-assertion to a frantic custodian is mediated through the clinical tools of his trade. The spit sucker, an instrument designed for standard dental hygiene, is converted into an engine of desperate evidence eradication, unkinked for maximal reach to scavenge the depths of the child’s throat. The text highlights the radical absurdity of this reversal: a man who, milliseconds prior, would have joyfully obliterated his family, reputation, license, and freedom to deposit his biological material, now suctions the fucking thing to ensure no residual metallic taste or aspiration pneumonia can invite legal scrutiny.
This act of suctioning is not merely pragmatic; it functions as a psychological defense mechanism—a ritual of moral resetting. The text notes that his extreme thoroughness is not so much care for a moral agent he had wronged as his way to express a clean slate, his way to symbolize that he was done for good now with such wronging. The repeated promises to stop are crucial here. The internal utterance of “No more” and “This is the last damn time” acts as a cyclical, secular absolution. These lines are not presented as exculpatory, but they complicate the portrait by introducing post-act lucidity and self-awareness without transformation. The offender recognizes his pattern, experiences the sobriety of post-pop relief, and yet the narrative voice observes that this fragile moral architecture is already doomed to crack the moment yet another set of breast buds enters his field of vision. This places the work in direct conversation with addiction literature, exploring the structural similarities between compulsive systems of behavior where the cleanup is an intrinsic component of the transgressive cycle itself, providing the empty baseline necessary for the next accumulation to begin.
When the text pans back to describe the physical mechanics of the assault, it deliberately strips the scene of clinical realism, opting instead for a grotesque, highly stylized aesthetic collage that functions as zoological estrangement. The offender is described almost as if by an alien naturalist, his motions transformed into a bizarre mating choreography and tracked through a series of jarring cultural and historical coordinates. He is depicted with a right leg hitched high like MC Hammer's dog, hands overlapped as if air humping to the New Jack of a 90s NYC nightclub, and hips pumping with the footing-loss frustration of a crazed stallion to the real song on the cloud playlist ("Hit Me with Your Best Shot"). This aesthetic choices achieves a radical de-individualization, removing Dr. James from a specific clinical setting and integrating him into a timeless, evolutionary lineage of biological expenditure where his labor unites him with builders of anthills and Giza pyramids alike. Furthermore, the juxtaposition of aging, arthritic joints, a cottage-cheese ass, a purple cock ring, and a "white ass grooving and grinding at the Slow Jamz tempo" highlights a profound incongruity. The body is exposed as a ridiculous, straining machine undergoing severe mechanical stress rather than an idealized vessel of transgression. Finally, the inclusion of Daddy/Doll Girl whispers (“Lil fuckin Sleeping Beauty, huh? Think I ain’t seeing through the bullshit”) demonstrates the predatory mind's need to impose a narrative of latent submission onto a completely unresponsive, chemically paralyzed victim, interpreting her sedation as a coded form of participation to preserve his own psychic deniability.
What elevates the piece beyond a clinical pathology study is its widening philosophical aperture. The narrator explicitly shifts from individual explanation to meta-absurdity: even if every behavior can be causally explained, explanation does not dissolve the existential grotesquerie of the pattern itself. This culminates in an extraordinary widening outward—from the man, to spiders and roots and ants, to AI, to creation itself. The offender’s absurd behavioral loop becomes a grotesque microcosm of a broader cosmic condition: a world of finite beings endlessly investing against entropy, building, desiring, and repeating, without having asked to exist. The text introduces a profound state of hermeneutic contamination that cannot be scrubbed out by the clinical efficacy of the suction rod or chlorhexidined wipes. Although the physical data can be vacuumed away into a plastic tube, the rank vibe of predation remains completely indelible, hanging in the air alongside the child's tousled hair, her nasal hood all out of whack, and the unmistakably yellow spunk passing through the line. The text explicitly links this local forensic anxiety to a systemic cosmic nausea. It asks whether a zoomed-in tracing of any finite creature investing desperation as the horizon of Etch-a-Sketch erasure gallops closer might awaken the same nausea even in an artificial intelligence thrown into this world like its parents.
The final question—whether this absurdity scales all the way back to the ultimate archē—reveals the piece’s deepest ambition. The true subject is not simply predation, but the metaphysical embarrassment of embodied desire itself. The criminal becomes the most lurid available specimen for examining whether life’s endless drives, investments, and self-defeating loops are intelligible in any ultimately satisfying sense. Formally, the piece is maximalist in a way that perfectly serves its themes. The prose mimics obsessive accumulation: clause upon clause, image upon image, mirroring the compulsive excess it depicts. The reader is meant to feel trapped inside a relentless, hyper-concentrated momentum where the sudden, frantic rush to clean what just milliseconds before the man would have destroyed his entire existence to soil becomes a terrifying, self-sustaining cycle of recurring violation.
Meta Description
A claustrophobic, maximalist prose piece exploring the hydraulic buildup of obsession, forensic panic, and sexual violation under medical sedation, tracking a predatory dentist's cycle of somatic accumulation, frantic cleanup, and existential absurdity.
Keywords
Pumps and a Bump, forensic panic, somatic accumulation, predatory mechanics, medical authority violation, sedation dentistry trauma, hermeneutic contamination, existential nausea, thermodynamic entropy, transgressive cycle, legal erasure, bodily economy, maximalist prose, metaphysics of desire
blog
FAQ
Don’t let anyone tell you that real life is lacking in poetic interest. This is exactly what the poet is for: he has the mind and the imagination to find something of interest in everyday things. Real life supplies the motifs, the points that need to be said—the actual heart of the matter; but it is the poet’s job to fashion it all into a beautiful, animated whole. You are familiar with Fürnstein, the so-called “nature poet”? He has written a poem about growing hops, and you couldn’t imagine anything nicer. I have now asked him to write some poems celebrating the work of skilled artisans, in particular weavers, and I am quite sure he will succeed; he has lived among such people from an early age, he knows the subject inside out, and will be in full command of his material. That is the advantage of small works: you need only choose subjects that you know and have at your command. With a longer poetic work, however, this is not possible. There is no way around it: all the different threads that tie the whole thing together, and are woven into the design, have to be shown in accurate detail. Young people only have a one-sided view of things, whereas a longer work requires a multiplicity of viewpoints—and that’s where they come unstuck.—Goethe (Conversations with Eckermann)
Featured Blog Posts
have appeared last night—
all those met along the way?

