to Hive being
welcome
What is Hive Being, and Why the Name?
You have likely heard talk of a hive mind, where one global mind finds more or less figurative expression in various local minds. Such talk is common enough in nature documentaries, especially ones concerning ants or bees, and in sci-fi programs. Take that notion, at least a loose version of it, and broaden its scope. That will be a decent first step in understanding the title I have chosen both for my Blog and for the first five-volume installment of my magnum opus Made For You and Me, a fragmentary collection of minimalist stanzas from 2016 to 2020.
In alignment with Spinoza (the 17th Century Rationalist to whom I devoted my doctoral studies), I view reality in its totality as a grand hive Being: all entities are but pulsating manifestations of the buckstopping fount of everything, an ultimate being we might call “God” or “Nature” (so long as, out of respect for the capital “G” and the capital “N,” we limit it neither to some anthropomorphic cloud father hurling lightning bolts nor to mere wilderness untouched by human smog). According to the hive-Being view (where reality is one lone superorganism, a monistic—and we might even say unividualist—conception I defend in both my creative and academic capacities), each non-foundational being (each being, that is, whose essence does not involve existence) is an utterly necessitated expression or eruption or exudation of this eternal source—each is, perhaps better put, a mode or manner of being, and so a focal point through which is disclosed, what classical theists sometimes call “being itself” (ipsum esse subsistens): the realness of the real, the being of whatever may be, the sheer activity of being, the very isness of whatever is. This Blog, which duplicates my Substack, throbs as but one among many literary unfurlings of this self-necessitated foundation, this supreme wellspring, of which we—like black holes and broken beliefs, like fractal ferns and flickering flames—are the inevitable stylings.
My Journey
I am an academic who found himself pressured into early retirement by the rising tides of cancel culture. The illiberal scourge of censoring, silencing, and shaming—although always with us throughout our evolution—reached a local peak around 2021. That was the turbulent year my creative pursuits, which the old left once encouraged as a healthy outlet for the stresses of a childhood steeped in poverty and illiteracy, drew the ire of the new safe-space left. A small cadre of self-proclaimed victims and their allies, several of whom continue to berate me years later under pseudonyms as see through as their sexual infatuation, sought to erase me and my heterodoxy. They found support from a wannabe-woke dean, covered in the grand inquisitor robes of our decadent modernity (full-body tattoos) and just itching to signal his commitment to protecting “vulnerable populations” from triggering material (even if just, as it was in my case, off-duty poems “unbecoming for someone calling himself a teacher”). Although I eventually won my due-process case with the help of The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, I slunk away from a college that turned its back on protecting freedom of expression and from an institution increasingly intolerant of intellectual diversity.
The wrecking ball to my too-comfy office in the windowless ivory tower came with a silver lining. From the ashes of my professional aspirations rose a phoenix of increased freedom to fulfill the literary calling I have pursued for decades. Reputation concerns never stopped me, even within academia’s sterile halls of conformity. Indeed, my unapologetic defiance, which has long baffled friends and family, no doubt chummed even safe waters—almost as if I were asking for it all along—until the cancel shiver grew too frenzied to hold back its blind thrashings. But now, now I piston the most forbidden territories of human thought with no longer even a twinge of conscience. The newfound freedom means extra time to hone my craft. When not assisting special-needs communities (a day job far more rewarding than freeway-flyer drudgeries), I pursue my literary mission with Dionysian fervor.
Call for Co-Conspirators
This space, my digital sanctuary, showcases the fruits of my mission. Think of my posts, even those linking to my publications, as works in progress. I want your input, unflinching brutality included. Each post begins with an invitation to action: “Let’s workshop this [draft about x, y, z].” Your contributions, whether through public comments or my contact page, help hammer scraps of ore into polished blades fit for magazine publication.
Your input is valuable, even if you are neither a writer nor a reader of literature—twin disciplines dying by the cyber nanosecond. Sometimes—even if at the risk of uttering banalities—an outsider’s fresh vantage can pierce the veils of convention to reveal what insiders miss. It often takes an outsider to make us even think to question our ingrained presuppositions and attitudes. I stand by the hygienic value of contagion. That is one reason I advocate so strongly for intellectual diversity and freedom of expression. And that is also one reason I was so harrowed by the anti-diversity swell of cancel culture in academia (an institution that should be the utmost caretaker of such values)—harrowed especially insofar as that swell masqueraded under the gaslighting guise of “diversity”).
You will witness the breathing evolution of my writings over time. To track these changes, I label each revision by round: “ROUND 2,” ROUND 3,” and so forth. Each piece undergoes continuous refinement based on your feedback and my own revisitations. Sometimes changes will mar the work. That is the risk of creative tinkering as a finite creature. I hope you will alert me to missteps. After many semesters of university writing workshops, one rule has impressed itself upon me: when someone senses a flaw, something almost always needs to change—even if, yes, the proposed solution misses the mark (which often it does). From a quick look into the archives, accessible here, you can see how much I have benefited from your feedback so far.
My Hope
Sharing drafts can be daunting. But showing you the ravaged and unperfumed real deal unfiltered by makeup (stuttering starts and falsities, awkward line breaks and clumsy word choices, grammatical errors and misspellings)—that not only makes my work more relatable, but helps me refine things through your input. I hope the unfiltered look at the raw process of fumbling, rather than just the polished product, also helps other writers develop their craft. Imperfect works often instruct more than perfect ones: whereas the perfect ones tend to have a grace by which they slip inside us without activating our scrutiny, the imperfect ones—especially the near perfect ones—show us glaringly what not to do.
People laugh at me, seeing—in my tilting at the windmills of literary excellence—a Don Quixote clunking around in Arthurian armor in a post-knight era. I am not naïve. I am well aware of the diminishing ability to read, let alone well: slowly and deeply, with gratitude. I am also aware that my style, which often nests subpoints within larger points, never waters down virtuosity for the sake of mass appeal. I watch readers stumble over my sentences, unable to unlock even just the music of the envelope let alone the semantic meat within, which—given my tendency to flashlight through the darker facets of human nature (the addicts, the miscreants, the abusers among us)—only adds an additional alienating layer of difficulty). Beholding these depressive scenes of even supportive family members getting bucked off my syntactic bronco makes me feel like a dinosaur who should get a hint and, if not succumb to the brain rot of skibidi-toilet speak, just hang himself already. Even though the decline in linguistic background and grammatical voltage makes my compositions seem quixotic in a world binging Netflix and TikTok, I persist—raging against the dying of the light—by some internal compulsion to celebrate the richness of language and thought.
My hope is that, despite social media’s unparalleled power to farm our attention, people never forget the unique power of writing. Beyond unveiling hypocrisy, teasing out complex implications, and detailing the commonalities between even the most alien phenomena, writing offers something we need today—trapped in agoraphobic cyber bubbles only thickened by the Lyme dangers of forests and the COVID dangers of cities—perhaps more than ever. Granting us rich access to the first-person perspectives of others (to how things feel to them), writing serves as one of humanity’s best tools for combating loneliness. It allows us to linger, broadly and deeply and at high resolution, within the inner lives of others in a way that other arts can only suggest.
What to Expect
My work spans a broad spectrum: from metaphysical discourses on free will and determinism and the ontology of holes to the ephemera of western culture (whether the childhood impacts of the hypersexual mono-image of black woman as squirting twerkers or Terrence Howard’s sham revolution of mathematics). Some tight and minimal, others free-flowing sprawls; some heady and abstract, others emotional and imagistic—my inkwell musings, which often blend scholarly rigor with a dark humor from both high and low culture, aim to capture the visceral intensity of our personal and social and ultimately existential predicaments.
By no means can I deny that drug abuse, sexual assault, and the tales of the broken and the damned loom large in the tag cloud of my work. My writing will never be a paradise of easy truths and comforting lies. It will challenge you, provoke you, and at times even repulse you. I offer no apologies for the monsters I unleash. They are as much a part of us, at long root scared rodent mammals scurrying in the shadows of dinosaurs, as our noblest aspirations.
But make no mistake. It is not all downer darkness. The archives are my receipts. You will find pieces exploring the pursuit of authenticity in a media-saturated world, the search for meaning in an indifferent cosmos, and the celebration of beauty in both the sublime and the profane. I locate much of my inspiration, in fact, in novelists like Dostoevsky and poets like Ted Kooser—writers unafraid to pursue moral agendas or risk Hallmark sentimentality in an age that often sneers at sincerity.
Be they satirical dissections of modern social dynamics or poignant poems about addiction or academic articles on moral responsibility, my goal is to provoke thought, evoke emotion, and foster meaningful dialogue. Fear has not and will not stop me from challenging humanity’s fundamental taboos (like bestiality and cannibalism) or self-reflecting into the dark chaos of the subconscious, even if that means exposing the Jungian shadows—the inner Goebbels—lurking within us all!
Expect posts each day, no day missed. Donations are welcome, but I impose no paywall: it feels wrong to charge for art, especially given our date with obliteration. Feel free to explore what amounts to, at the time of writing this, close to a thousand pieces of poetry and prose here. That should give you a sense of what awaits.
Join me—specula holstered—on this literary odyssey into the public and private nooks of the hive Being. Let us navigate the labyrinth of creation together, confronting our demons and even slaying our darlings if we must. Let us dance on the razor’s edge between the sublime and the profane in pursuit of an elusive literary perfection never to be confused—as it has been confused in our declining civilization—with the pursuit of popularity or likeability over truth.
tag cloud
- literature community
- American literature
- poetry
- literature
- poem
- literary
- creative writing
- writing
- poetry community
- Michael Istvan
- Istvan
- perception
- defiance
- suffering
- existential poetry
- dissociative
- existential
- healing
- human
- mortality
- power
- art
- artist
- God
- evolution
- love
- death
- darwin
- anxiety
- rape
- psychoanalysis
- addiction
- meditation
- homeless
- addict
- trauma
- therapy
- rapist
- traumatic
- hypersexual
- poverty
- grooming
- hyperarousal
- anal
- anal sex
- choking
- heart
- incendiary
- dead
- traitor
- honey pot
- treachery
- true crime
- identity
- fap
- Identitarianism
- tyrant
- cunnilingus
- power dynamic
- crack
- Vaginal
- woke
- poet
- OwnVoices
- disease
- animals
- sex
- empathy
- identity politics
- ally
- crime
- scarf
- summer
- Vagina
- safe space
- indians
- body disposal
- adolescence
- kidnapping
- poetry editor
- turtles
- Pussy
- censor
- Nietzsche
- censors
- campus warrior
- substance abuse
- Klan
- anality
- surrealism
- fisting
- Earth
- sensual
- resilience
- erotic
- hardship
- scatalogical
- sublime
- turtle
- dogs
Posts
Sucia (ROUND 1)
“Sucia” is a compact poem about the aftermath of sexual abuse and the catastrophic way it can reorganize a child’s body, behavior, and family life. Its central claim is not that the mother merely misperceives the girl as sexualized, but that the boyfriend’s abuse has in fact made the preteen hypersexual—has turned “every hole” into “an agent / ravenous and scheming.” The poem’s language is deliberately harsh because it is trying to name one of abuse’s ugliest consequences: the child’s body and desire have been distorted by violation, trained into compulsive erotic responsiveness before she has the maturity to understand or govern it.
That opening image is crucial. The boyfriend has “turned every hole of your preteen / into an agent,” meaning the child has been altered at the level of instinct and embodiment. The word “agent” matters because it suggests activity, appetite, and strategy. The abuse has not left her inert; it has made her body hungry, manipulative even, not by nature but by conditioning. The poem is therefore confronting a truth that is morally difficult but psychologically recognizable: sexual abuse can produce hypersexual behavior in the child who has been abused. The girl is not thereby culpable, but neither is she untouched. The poem refuses the easier language of passive innocence only because it is interested in the damage as it actually unfolds.
This is what makes the mother’s position so terrible. After learning what her boyfriend has done, “it was hard to tell what was worse”: slapping the girl and calling her “Dirty slut!” or continuing to let the man persuade her that kicking the girl out would be cruel. The force of the poem lies in this impossible bind. The mother is not simply projecting fantasy onto an innocent child; she is reacting to a real transformation in the girl, one induced by the man’s abuse. The girl’s emerging sexualized behavior now tears through the household, and the mother responds in two equally disastrous ways. One is direct violence and shaming. The other is sentimental paralysis, allowing the abuser to remain and to keep defining the situation.
The title, “Sucia,” intensifies that tragedy. The slur does not tell us what the girl is in any deep moral sense; it tells us how the damage appears within the family. She has become “dirty” not because she chose corruption, but because corruption has been worked into her. The mother’s slap and insult are thus acts of secondary violence, punishing the child for what was made of her. At the same time, the poem does not spare the girl’s altered sexuality its full ugliness. It insists that the abuse has made her bodily and psychically dangerous within the domestic space—not dangerous in the sense of blameworthiness, but dangerous in the sense that the abuse now reproduces itself through her changed appetites and behaviors.
The line “leaking him that night” is especially devastating. It shows the mother still sleeping with the boyfriend, still physically bound to him, even after discovering what he has done. This is not incidental hypocrisy. It reveals how abuse persists inside systems of dependency and desire. The man remains erotically and emotionally central enough that the mother continues to take him in, literally and bodily, while trying to decide what to do about the daughter he has transformed. The poem’s horror is that the mother’s two options are both betrayals: strike the girl as if she were the author of the problem, or keep the man and call expulsion “cruel.” In both cases, the child remains trapped inside the consequences of what he has done to her.
What makes “Sucia” so strong is its compression. It does not explain the whole history of the household or moralize from above. Instead, it isolates the instant in which revelation, rage, desire, and complicity collide. The poem’s insight is that abuse does not only injure the child once; it can reshape the child into someone whose sexuality has been prematurely and monstrously awakened, forcing everyone around her to respond to a condition they helped create or failed to stop. “Sucia” is unsparing because it wants to show that the real obscenity is not a mother’s false perception, but the fact that the abuse has made the girl genuinely hypersexual before her time—and then left the adults to punish her for it.
Meta Description:
“Sucia” is a stark poem about a preteen girl made hypersexual by her mother’s boyfriend’s abuse, and the mother’s catastrophic response of both shaming the child and remaining bound to the abuser. The poem examines sexual conditioning, secondary violence, and family collapse in the wake of abuse.
Keywords:
child sexual abuse, hypersexuality after abuse, maternal betrayal, secondary trauma, victim shaming, family violence, grooming consequences, abuse and conditioning, domestic collapse, poetic compression, altered childhood sexuality
Sinners Portion of "Hypocorism" (ROUND 1)
Let’s workshop this portion of a story about an adult-minor romance I have been working hard on behind the scenes over the last months--this portion being relevant given the Oscar success of Sinners.
Modern Geometry (ROUND 1)
“Modern Geometry” is a short, nostalgic poem about the tactile rituals of school life, using the act of covering a textbook with a brown grocery bag as a metaphor for discipline, identity formation, and a specifically American idea of doing things the proper way. The poem’s title is ironic and precise: the “geometry” in question is not mathematical but manual—the careful folding, creasing, and measuring required to make the cover fit exactly. What might seem like a trivial classroom habit becomes, in the poem’s treatment, a small initiation into order, self-control, and belonging.
The opening lines focus on the physical wear of use: “Skin oil and fretful friction / had teased a fuzzy nap / along the spine of his textbook.” The detail is intimate and exact. The book is not just an object but something handled constantly, worried at, pressed, and rubbed by anxious hands. The phrase “fretful friction” suggests both nervous energy and the repetitive motions of a student trying to keep things neat while living inside the restless atmosphere of adolescence. The worn nap on the paper bag shows how time and touch leave marks, even on something meant to protect the book.
The middle image shifts to the construction of the cover itself: “a brown grocery bag / folded with triple-checked tension / into creaking sleeves.” The language gives the act a kind of ceremonial gravity. The folds must be exact, the tension just right, the sleeves snug. The creaking paper evokes the sensory memory of thick grocery bags being bent into shape, a sound familiar to anyone who went through classrooms where this ritual was expected. The precision of the folding mirrors the precision suggested by the title, turning a mundane school task into a kind of craft.
The final lines introduce the poem’s key idea: “for he would not cheat / the American rite— / not a single piece of tape.” The refusal to use tape is what transforms the scene from simple description into cultural commentary. Covering books without tape was often treated as a small test of skill and patience, something learned from parents, teachers, or older siblings. Calling it an “American rite” elevates the act into a shared cultural practice, a minor initiation into rules, effort, and pride in doing something correctly without shortcuts. The insistence on no tape suggests an ethic of self-reliance: the cover must hold by the strength of its folds alone.
The poem’s humor lies in how seriously it treats such a small thing, but the seriousness is not entirely ironic. The careful folding becomes a symbol of a time when order, neatness, and doing things the right way carried moral weight, even in childhood. The “modern” in the title hints that this kind of geometry may no longer be common, making the memory feel both precise and slightly lost.
Meta Description:
A nostalgic poem about covering school textbooks with brown grocery bags, using the ritual of careful folding without tape as a metaphor for discipline, precision, and a small but meaningful American rite of childhood.
Keywords:
nostalgia poetry, school rituals, brown paper book covers, childhood discipline, American rite, tactile memory, classroom culture, metaphor of folding, everyday craftsmanship, coming-of-age details, modern geometry poem
Three Lip Bites (ROUND 1)
“Three Lip Bites” is a compressed poem about adolescent jealousy, erotic hierarchy, and the humiliating discovery that desire does not always follow the script of innocent proximity. Its emotional force depends on a sharp asymmetry: the speaker is a schoolboy nursing tender, labor-intensive hopes for his ninth-grade crush, while the girl herself is drawn not toward a peer but toward a much older man—“former security / here”—whose age, authority residue, and rough charisma place him in an entirely different erotic category. The poem thus captures not just unrequited affection but the boy’s initiation into a disturbing social truth: the girl he idealizes is already oriented toward a world of adult danger and status that makes his own fantasies of care feel small, naïve, and irrelevant.
The opening image situates the speaker in confinement and impotence. He watches “from the bus window,” already separated from the scene by glass, transit, and institutional routine. His nervous body registers the shock before his mind can fully process it: he is “wringing / the brown-bag textbook / to a muggy bow.” That detail is exquisitely chosen. The textbook, wrapped and school-bound, stands for his own world—study, discipline, ordinary adolescent aspiration. Twisting it into a damp bow turns that world into something physically deformed by feeling. The gesture is private, self-contained, and powerless, a bodily analogue to the poem’s title: lip bites, textbook wringing, all the minor violences by which one tries to endure public humiliation without outwardly breaking.
The girl appears next, “sag[ging] against a car vibrating bass,” and the poem immediately makes clear that she belongs, at least in this moment, to a sensory and social realm far beyond the speaker’s careful plans. The bass-heavy car culture, the outdoor sexual display, the slouching bodily ease—all of it contrasts with the boy on the bus holding his schoolbook. Then comes the crucial figure: “a durag thug (former security / here).” The parenthetical is everything. This is not some slightly older local boy; he is an adult man, well past school age, someone who once occupied a quasi-authoritative role around the school and now returns as an object of erotic attraction. The speaker recognizes him not merely as a rival but as a man whose age and aura carry their own charge. The girl’s desire is directed upward and outward—toward maturity, hardness, danger, and social power.
That is why the next image lands so brutally: he is “palming her ass like property.” From the speaker’s vantage, the gesture is not romantic but proprietary, and the phrase “like property” reveals both moral revulsion and jealousy. Yet the poem’s key complication is that the girl is not being described as passive clay. The poem’s pain depends on her attraction to this older man. She is choosing the vibration, the public sexuality, the charged age gap, the hard-edged masculinity embodied by someone “former security here.” That fact makes the speaker’s suffering more acute. He is not simply losing to a peer or watching coercion from afar; he is realizing that what he has to offer—attention, patience, “up-all-night plans / to walk her home”—is not what she wants.
Those final lines expose the poem’s emotional center. The scene is “a ‘fuck you’ to up-all-night plans / to walk her home.” The boy’s imagined devotion is modest, deferential, almost quaint. He does not fantasize conquest but accompaniment. He stays up thinking about how to be near her, how to protect or escort her, how to make himself useful in the register of care. What devastates him is not simply that she is with someone else, but that her desire appears to negate the whole value system his plans embodied. The older man’s hand on her body seems to mock the boy’s tenderness itself. The poem therefore stages a quintessential adolescent wound: the discovery that sincerity, patience, and thoughtfulness do not guarantee erotic relevance—and may in fact look powerless beside the swagger of someone older, rougher, and more socially commanding.
The title, “Three Lip Bites,” crystallizes the poem’s method. Lip biting is a small, private reflex of restraint—part pain, part desire, part self-control. The number gives the gesture ritual precision, as if the speaker counts his own silent injuries while the bus rolls past. The poem is built from such minor containments. There is no confrontation, no speech, no melodramatic outburst. Instead, humiliation is internalized into the body: bitten lips, wrung textbook, swallowed recognition. This restraint is what gives the poem its sting. It understands that adolescence is often defined not by grand events but by these tiny moments in which one learns, all at once, about classed desire, sexual power, age asymmetry, and one’s own disposability in another person’s fantasy life.
Meta Description:
“Three Lip Bites” is a concise poem about adolescent humiliation and unrequited desire, in which a schoolboy watches his ninth-grade crush openly drawn to a much older former school security guard, turning his tender plans to walk her home into a bitter lesson in erotic hierarchy.
Keywords:
adolescent jealousy, age-gap desire, older man younger girl, unrequited crush, erotic hierarchy, school setting, humiliation, male adolescence, public sexuality, classed masculinity, power and attraction, poetic compression, coming-of-age pain
Plagues of the Special (ROUND 2)
“Plagues of the Special” is a compact satirical poem about hereditary exceptionalism—more specifically, about the way certain families or subcultures convert disorder, coincidence, fantasy, and anecdote into a lineage of chosenness. The title is doing immediate conceptual work. “Plagues” evokes affliction, visitation, and biblical curse, while “the Special” suggests those who understand themselves not as ordinary sufferers but as uniquely singled out. The poem therefore frames its subject as a paradox: the burden of being special becomes itself a treasured inheritance.
The opening lines present absurdly escalating paranormal claims as family traits: “flying-saucer / anal probes,” “handsy poltergeists,” “intrusive / previsions,” “holy statues / bleeding always off camera.” The humor comes from accumulation and deadpan inheritance logic. These are treated almost like eye color or heart disease—conditions that “run in the family.” By placing extraterrestrial assault, ghostly molestation, prophecy, and miracle-statue lore in the same genealogical basket, the poem satirizes a worldview in which extraordinary claims are normalized through kinship repetition. If enough relatives tell versions of the same story, the bizarre acquires the status of family fact.
At the same time, the poem is not only mocking paranormal belief. It is targeting a deeper psychological pattern: the desire to belong to a clan marked by special access to hidden reality. The family’s suffering is inseparable from its distinction. Their experiences are invasive, frightening, humiliating even—but also meaningful. To be probed, haunted, visited, or granted prevision is to matter in a cosmos that otherwise offers no personalized attention. The poem’s satire lands on that emotional economy: affliction becomes prestige.
The line about statues “bleeding always off camera” is especially sharp because it condenses a whole epistemology of unverifiability. Miracles occur, but never when documentation would settle the matter. The claim survives by permanently inhabiting the zone just beyond evidence. This prepares for the closing turn, where the neighbors are dismissed as “government shills.” Their testimony—that they “never saw one damn light”—cannot count as disconfirming evidence because the belief system has already immunized itself against contradiction. Skeptics are not merely mistaken; they are agents of suppression. In this sense, the poem skewers conspiracy logic as much as supernatural credulity. The absence of public corroboration is not a problem for the believer but proof of the cover-up.
The diction matters. “Government shills” and “all of the fuckers” inject a coarse populist rage that contrasts with the supposedly numinous subject matter. That tonal collision is part of the poem’s success. The language of cosmic mystery is dragged down into the idiom of neighborhood grievance and familial paranoia. The sublime becomes petty, and the petty becomes metaphysical.
What emerges is a portrait of a mentality structured by persecution and distinction at once. The family is beset by impossible phenomena, yet those same phenomena make them elect, initiated, more alive to hidden truths than the dull ordinary world around them. The “neighbors” stand for consensus reality—mundane, unglamorous, unenchanted. The family’s need is not merely to reject that reality but to vilify it. Ordinary people must be dupes or accomplices, because otherwise the family’s specialness would collapse into delusion.
The poem’s brevity is central to its force. It does not explain or diagnose; it lets the absurdity self-expose through compression. In just a few lines, it captures how extraordinary self-conceptions can become hereditary, how unverifiable claims gain force through repetition, and how contradiction is neutralized by conspiracy thinking. “Plagues of the Special” is therefore less a poem about UFOs or poltergeists than about the social and emotional uses of belief—especially beliefs that flatter the sufferer with the idea that their suffering proves they were chosen for more than ordinary life.
Meta Description:
A satirical poem about families who inherit paranormal afflictions as badges of specialness, “Plagues of the Special” skewers conspiracy thinking, unverifiable miracle claims, and the emotional prestige of being singled out by hidden forces.
Keywords:
satirical poetry, conspiracy mentality, paranormal belief, family mythology, chosen suffering, UFO abduction satire, miracle skepticism, hereditary specialness, unverifiable claims, social psychology of belief
Polishing the Family Silver (ROUND 1)
“Polishing the Family Silver” is a short satirical poem about inherited identity narratives and the way stories of suffering can become both shield and status marker. The title itself establishes the central metaphor. “Family silver” suggests something passed down through generations, something carefully maintained because it symbolizes lineage, continuity, and legitimacy. To polish the silver is not to create it but to keep it shining—to preserve a story about who one is and where one comes from. The poem applies this metaphor to a communal self-conception grounded not in achievement but in grievance, implying that the inherited narrative of injury is guarded with the same care as a treasured heirloom.
The opening lines describe how “the story about themselves / imparts such a sense / of lineal belonging / that they guard it.” The emphasis falls on the psychological function of the story. It provides coherence, a feeling of rootedness, a sense that one’s place in the world is secured by ancestry and shared experience. The comparison to a sanctuary reinforces the idea that this narrative is treated as sacred space, something not to be questioned without provoking defensiveness. What matters is not whether the story is fully accurate but that it binds the group together and gives meaning to present identity.
The poem’s tone shifts in the second half, where the preservation of that story is linked to “pity-exacting pageants / of self-sabotage.” The word “pageants” is important because it suggests performance. The poem implies that certain behaviors function not only as expressions of frustration or despair but also as public reenactments of the narrative of victimhood. These displays reaffirm the group’s sense of having been wronged, and the pity they provoke becomes part of the cycle that keeps the story alive. The satire lies in the suggestion that the performance can become self-perpetuating: the identity built on injury begins to require ongoing demonstrations of injury.
The poem then pushes this idea further with deliberately abrasive imagery of excess and self-destructive display. These details are not there simply for shock; they underline the claim that the performance has moved beyond protest or survival into spectacle. What once may have been a response to real hardship becomes stylized behavior that reinforces the inherited narrative. By presenting these actions as part of the ritual of belonging, the poem questions whether the community is protecting its members or trapping them within a role.
The closing line—“anoints them / supreme victims”—returns to the religious language introduced earlier with “sanctuary.” To be anointed is to be set apart, consecrated. Here the consecration is ironic: the highest status within the story is achieved not through accomplishment but through the ability to embody suffering most convincingly. The poem’s critique is therefore not of suffering itself but of the way suffering can become a form of cultural capital, something that grants authority and immunity within the group.
What makes the poem effective is its compression. In just a few lines it moves from inheritance, to performance, to sanctification, showing how identity can be stabilized through narratives that are both protective and limiting. The metaphor of polishing the family silver suggests that these narratives endure not because they are always true or helpful, but because they provide continuity, and continuity itself can feel too valuable to relinquish.
Meta Description:
A satirical poem about inherited victim narratives, using the metaphor of “family silver” to show how stories of suffering can become sacred traditions that provide belonging while encouraging performative self-destruction.
Keywords:
satirical poetry, identity narratives, victimhood culture, inheritance metaphor, family silver, performative suffering, cultural belonging, social critique, ritual and identity, generational trauma, satire of grievance
Leaves of Three Let Them Be
The poem "Leaves of Three Let Them Be" meditates on the tension between intuition, learned knowledge, and adaptability in navigating both ordinary and high-stakes situations. The title itself references the common adage warning of poison ivy, symbolizing the necessity of learned caution in the natural world. The phrase also sets the thematic stage for the poem’s exploration of when to trust preconceptions and when to challenge them.
In the first stanza, the metaphor of a blind tasting—commonly used in wine appreciation to strip away biases associated with labels—introduces the idea that we are often better served when freed from the weight of preconceptions. For sommeliers, whose craft is deeply tied to sensory perception, removing biases is necessary to fully understand the essence of what is tasted. The implicit argument is that, in areas of subjective judgment or fine distinctions, this approach enables greater clarity and authenticity. However, the poem pivots sharply in its second stanza, where it shifts the context from leisure or craft to survival, specifically on the "front lines." Here, the stakes are higher, and the dismissing of labels or preconceptions becomes not only impractical but dangerous.
The poem highlights a fundamental human dilemma: balancing the wisdom of experience—"labels and preconceptions"—with the need to remain open to new information. Labels are initially portrayed as "saviors," suggesting that our ability to categorize and interpret the world based on past knowledge is crucial for survival, especially in volatile or unpredictable environments. Yet the poem does not endorse rigid adherence to these preconceptions. The closing lines emphasize flexibility: the ability to "drop them in the face of new evidence." This nuanced argument underscores the poem's central theme—that the most adaptive and intelligent approach to the world involves a balance between relying on past knowledge and being open to change when circumstances demand it.
The poem, though concise, engages deeply with cognitive and philosophical issues, such as epistemology (how we know what we know) and the psychology of decision-making under uncertainty. It suggests that in a world marked by complexity and unpredictability, the survival of both individuals and societies depends not just on the knowledge they have accumulated but on their capacity to revise that knowledge when confronted with new truths. This openness to reconsidering one’s assumptions is framed as essential not only in intellectual pursuits but also in life-and-death situations, making it a universal call for intellectual humility and adaptability.
preconceptions, survival, adaptability, intellectual humility, blind tasting, labels, cognitive flexibility, epistemology, decision-making, new evidence.
Pulling Rank
"Pulling Rank" is a pointed critique of how identity is leveraged in contemporary social and political discourse, particularly within the framework of identity politics. The poem’s opening, “She opens her soliloquy with that dissent-snuffing script: 'Speaking as an x person,'” reveals the speaker’s frustration with the pre-emptive use of identity as a conversational weapon. By placing “dissent-snuffing” before “script,” the poem underscores how these opening words are not just a statement of personal identity, but a strategic move designed to shut down debate or criticism. The act of “pulling rank” on the basis of one’s identity highlights a shift from argumentation based on shared principles or logic to one dominated by personal experience, making it difficult for those outside the identity category to engage without being accused of invalidating the speaker's lived experience.
The “flex of ethnic high ground” reflects how this identity-based discourse often involves elevating one’s own cultural or racial background as inherently superior in matters of truth or justice. The metaphor of “sob-story judo” portrays the inversion of traditional power dynamics, where suffering, real or exaggerated, becomes a tool for rhetorical victory. Judo, a martial art focused on using an opponent's strength against them, serves as a fitting metaphor for how personal narratives of hardship can be wielded against any form of criticism or opposition. The “my-truth supremacy” that follows critiques the cultural rise of subjective narratives being given precedence over more objective, universally shared truths. This “supremacy” of personal truth aligns with the contemporary emphasis on the sanctity of lived experiences, even when such experiences are insulated from external validation or critique.
The poem taps into a larger cultural critique of how victimhood, particularly racial or ethnic victimhood, can be weaponized. The phrase “effective in a zeitgeist where, unless your skin skews pale, even fake bruises are brass knuckles” extends this critique, suggesting that in an era where whiteness is associated with privilege, any claim of marginalization by people of color—even falsified or exaggerated claims (“fake bruises”)—carries disproportionate rhetorical weight (“brass knuckles”). This line captures the speaker’s frustration with the asymmetry in cultural conversations about race, identity, and oppression. The suggestion that even “fake bruises” can be weaponized hints at a deeper skepticism about the authenticity of some claims of victimhood within identity politics, questioning whether the current climate enables the performance of victimhood rather than a genuine exchange of ideas.
The overall theme of the poem is a nuanced exploration of how identity, particularly marginalized identities, are wielded in modern discourse. The speaker’s tone, at times sardonic, reveals a frustration with the limitations this type of discourse imposes on genuine dialogue and critical engagement. The poem exposes the tension between recognizing genuine marginalization and the potential for exploitation, wherein identity becomes a currency that stifles rather than fosters meaningful conversation. This critique calls into question the boundaries between empathy and manipulation, raising the issue of whether the current discourse around identity truly seeks justice or merely uses suffering as a rhetorical advantage.
identity politics, victimhood, personal narrative, discourse, rhetorical dominance, ethnic hierarchy, power dynamics, subjective truth, marginalization, cultural critique
Daily Affirmations for a Campus Warrior
In "Daily Affirmations for a Campus Warrior," the author presents a satirical take on contemporary campus culture, particularly focusing on the extreme sensitivity and self-righteousness perceived among some student activists. The poem, dedicated to Margaret Atwood, critiques the modern phenomena of trigger warnings, safe spaces, and the cancel culture prevalent in academic environments.
The poem is structured as a series of affirmations, which are typically used to reinforce positive thinking and self-worth. However, in this context, the affirmations are exaggerated to highlight what the author sees as the absurdity of certain attitudes. Each line is a statement that mocks the extremes of victim mentality and the entitlement to absolute emotional protection and moral authority.
The opening lines, "Anything can be a trigger / I stand up for myself and have a right to be recognized," set the tone for the poem. These lines reflect the idea that the current campus environment allows for an overly broad interpretation of what constitutes a trigger, granting individuals the power to demand recognition and accommodation for any perceived slight or discomfort.
As the poem progresses, the affirmations become increasingly hyperbolic, reflecting the author's view that the demands for emotional safety and recognition have gone too far. Lines such as "My virtue, as a victim, gives me absolute moral license" and "Worthy, I am entitled to shout down what is alien to me" critique the notion that victimhood confers moral superiority and the right to silence dissenting voices.
The poem also addresses the culture of canceling and censoring ideas that are deemed offensive. Lines like "I am allowed to censor art and people if it makes me feel better" and "Ban problematic 'art' before examination; it only gives us pain" suggest that the drive to protect students from discomfort has led to a stifling of free expression and critical engagement.
In addition to the critique of cancel culture, the poem mocks the idea that emotional fragility should be indulged rather than worked on. Lines such as "Emotional fragility is to be indulged, not 'worked on'" and "Meltdowns are okay to get what I want: they mean I deserve it" highlight the author's belief that the emphasis on emotional safety can hinder personal growth and resilience.
The poem's conclusion, "Triggering equals raping; raping calls for instant cancellation / Emotional fragility is to be indulged, not 'worked on,'" encapsulates the satirical message. The comparison between triggering and rape is an extreme exaggeration meant to underscore the perceived irrationality of equating emotional discomfort with severe trauma. It also criticizes the tendency to immediately cancel individuals without due process based on subjective feelings of offense.
Overall, "Daily Affirmations for a Campus Warrior" uses satire to critique what the author views as the excesses of modern campus culture. By presenting these exaggerated affirmations, the poem calls into question the balance between protecting individuals from genuine harm and fostering an environment of robust intellectual engagement and personal growth. Through its biting humor and pointed commentary, the poem challenges readers to reconsider the implications of prioritizing emotional comfort over the pursuit of truth and resilience.
The Help
**The Help** delves into the performative solidarity and the underlying self-serving motivations of a group of white women as they navigate their own feelings of guilt and privilege. Set against the backdrop of a watch-party for the film *The Help*, the poem exposes the superficial and often condescending nature of their attempts to connect with and understand the struggles of people of color.
The scene opens with the women gathered, equipped with box rosé, scarves, and tears—a tableau of desperate solidarity. They are eager to absolve their shame and prove their subservience, glancing nervously at their token person of color. This individual, cornered before the film begins, becomes the focus of their awkward attempts at connection. Each woman, in her way, seeks to express her perceived enlightenment and distance herself from the racism of her own circle, whether by criticizing white features, expressing fear of white men (including their own husbands), or showcasing their tokenistic connections to black individuals.
Their conversation brims with self-congratulatory remarks and superficial praises, particularly directed at the actresses of the film. They fawn over Octavia Spencer's beauty, marveling at her skin, and maintain a facade of reverence and reflection, giving the floor to the "oppressed voice" only after the credits roll. This restraint is insufferable for the inebriated group, who are impatient to express their well-meaning yet condescending pity.
As the poem progresses, it becomes clear that their concern for "people of color" is tainted by their desire to be seen as saviors. They believe it is their duty to educate and uplift, yet their efforts are steeped in a patronizing attitude that fails to recognize the agency and resilience of those they claim to support. Their discussions reveal a disconnect between their self-image and the reality of their impact, highlighting a persistent, albeit well-intentioned, form of racism.
**The Help** critiques the performative nature of allyship and the superficial efforts of those who, while professing solidarity, perpetuate a dynamic of dependency and condescension. Through its vivid portrayal of a watch-party, the poem underscores the complexity and often problematic aspects of modern-day attempts at racial reconciliation.
blog
FAQ
Visit my Substack: Hive Being
Visit my Substack: Hive Being
Don’t let anyone tell you that real life is lacking in poetic interest. This is exactly what the poet is for: he has the mind and the imagination to find something of interest in everyday things. Real life supplies the motifs, the points that need to be said—the actual heart of the matter; but it is the poet’s job to fashion it all into a beautiful, animated whole. You are familiar with Fürnstein, the so-called “nature poet”? He has written a poem about growing hops, and you couldn’t imagine anything nicer. I have now asked him to write some poems celebrating the work of skilled artisans, in particular weavers, and I am quite sure he will succeed; he has lived among such people from an early age, he knows the subject inside out, and will be in full command of his material. That is the advantage of small works: you need only choose subjects that you know and have at your command. With a longer poetic work, however, this is not possible. There is no way around it: all the different threads that tie the whole thing together, and are woven into the design, have to be shown in accurate detail. Young people only have a one-sided view of things, whereas a longer work requires a multiplicity of viewpoints—and that’s where they come unstuck.—Goethe (Conversations with Eckermann)
Featured Blog Posts
have appeared last night—
all those met along the way?